<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chat Applications Review : Digichat, Flashchat, Realchat, Parachat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat</link>
	<description>Logician's Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:42:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ncu</title>
		<link>http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Ncu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logician.org/?p=8#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Just a few comments:
you need to distinguish between server side and client side languages/platform. The most common are: 
HTML/JS+Php
HTML/JS+Java
Java on both client and server
Flash + media server

The best is Flash+media server since one server can hold hundreds/thousands of users online at the same time and you also get audio+video chat.

I think next is HTML/JS + a Java server.

HTML/JS + Php will create a decent load on the server since it works by pooling the db.

Java+Java is the worst solution since very few people have Java on client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a few comments:<br />
you need to distinguish between server side and client side languages/platform. The most common are:<br />
HTML/JS+Php<br />
HTML/JS+Java<br />
Java on both client and server<br />
Flash + media server</p>
<p>The best is Flash+media server since one server can hold hundreds/thousands of users online at the same time and you also get audio+video chat.</p>
<p>I think next is HTML/JS + a Java server.</p>
<p>HTML/JS + Php will create a decent load on the server since it works by pooling the db.</p>
<p>Java+Java is the worst solution since very few people have Java on client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ncu</title>
		<link>http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat/comment-page-1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Ncu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logician.org/?p=8#comment-41</guid>
		<description>@veronica, you can also try AVChat 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@veronica, you can also try AVChat 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veronica</title>
		<link>http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat/comment-page-1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logician.org/?p=8#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Logician, are they are any new products you have come across more suitable since your blog? By the way, your blog has been insightful. Thank you. Great Blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logician, are they are any new products you have come across more suitable since your blog? By the way, your blog has been insightful. Thank you. Great Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat/comment-page-1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logician.org/?p=8#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Hi, thanks so much for this article, which was a big help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, thanks so much for this article, which was a big help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chatter Boi</title>
		<link>http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Chatter Boi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logician.org/?p=8#comment-34</guid>
		<description>We have used ParaChat for years now and it has grown as our website has. We have had no issues with it&#039;s reliability. However we used digichat for a few months and found it VERY unstable after about 400 concurrent users. My vote? ParaChat. I heard they are working on a ParaChat iPhone App. I can&#039;t wait to see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have used ParaChat for years now and it has grown as our website has. We have had no issues with it&#8217;s reliability. However we used digichat for a few months and found it VERY unstable after about 400 concurrent users. My vote? ParaChat. I heard they are working on a ParaChat iPhone App. I can&#8217;t wait to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gand</title>
		<link>http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat/comment-page-1#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Gand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logician.org/?p=8#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Thank you for writing this interesting comparison. I own a Digichat site myself but I&#039;m looking for an affordable Digichat hosting solution, which poses a problem..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for writing this interesting comparison. I own a Digichat site myself but I&#8217;m looking for an affordable Digichat hosting solution, which poses a problem..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Japan Chat</title>
		<link>http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat/comment-page-1#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Japan Chat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logician.org/?p=8#comment-18</guid>
		<description>This is a useful article, thank you. One thing that you could have touched on a little more was how many concurrent users each script can handle and how much the hosted solutions cost per user per month. Other than leaving out some of the financial issues related to the chat hosting, this is a nice in depth article. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a useful article, thank you. One thing that you could have touched on a little more was how many concurrent users each script can handle and how much the hosted solutions cost per user per month. Other than leaving out some of the financial issues related to the chat hosting, this is a nice in depth article. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Marketing Services, Dedicated Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.logician.org/8-chat-applications-review-digichat-flashchat-realchat-parachat/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Marketing Services, Dedicated Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 09:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.logician.org/?p=8#comment-17</guid>
		<description>your article is much more informatic for all of the visitor. I am very happy to read it. Thank you for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your article is much more informatic for all of the visitor. I am very happy to read it. Thank you for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
